The storm that impacted our region on Wednesday and Thursday, December 4 and 5, delivered at the low end of what was forecasted. Eight inches of new dense snow was recorded at the study site at 10,800 feet. The snow was heavy and wet, measuring at least 10% water. Winds shifted to the northwest as cooling turned rain to snow later in the storm. At lower elevations the rain effectively put an end to much of the powder skiing that was enjoyed over the last week. Mash potatoes and crusts were the results. No wet avalanches were reported.
Except above treeline (>12,000’), rain crusts are pervasive. Near treeline, crusts are buried beneath new snow or exposed where new snow has been wind scoured. Below the snow line of the recent storm (<9000’) water saturated snow exists, much of which has now refrozen with cooler temperatures.
Looking forward, deep slabs from the "White Friday Storm" seem to be bonding well with the snowpack below. Some localized instabilities may exist from the new snow, but natural avalanches seem unlikely. Pockets of instability in both new storm slab and newly formed wind slab may be sensitive to human triggers. It is probably prudent to avoid pillowed or hollow sounding slopes (>35 degrees) at and above treeline. Conditions should improve over the next 24 hours.
Several field observers have noted that the snowpack is gaining strength and showing little propensity to fracture. Most of these observations were made prior to the most recent storm. Concerns of avalanche hazard will be primarily confined to new snow and new wind transported snow.
Near and Above TreelineThe forecast for 9-15" of new snow near treeline on Wednesday/Thursday was not met. West winds were observed, but generally lighter than anticipated. The ASBTP weather station anemometer has not been reporting since Saturday morning November 30, presumably due to wind riming. As a result, wind velocity thresholds for transporting snow along ridge tops is somewhat speculative.
Below TreelineRain fell below 9,000 feet. In some locations nearly one inch was recorded. Overall, some snowpack ablation occurred and rain crusts formation was widespread. No wet avalanches were reported.
It should be noted that rain crusts provide fertile environments for near surface facet growth, so keep an eye pealed for this weak layer phenomena in the near future.
Below the snow line, rain from the recent storm has saturated the upper snowpack structure. The free water has refrozen, locking grains together and strengthening the snowpack. In some zones, the snowpack is behaving like isothermal spring-like conditions, rock hard in the morning, but softening during the day.
Coverage for ski touring is still good for early December, but early season hazards such as downed trees, stumps, and boulders may still remain hidden near the surface at lower elevations. Coverage above 9,000’ is still generally three feet of snow. Lower elevation snowpack (7500') has been adversely impacted by recent rain.
Pockets of wind slab may exist from snow movement during the most recent storm. Although both snowfall and wind speeds appear to have failed to meet forecast thresholds, pockets of wind slab are still possible. Watch for new wind slabs above treeline, particularly on easterly and southeasterly slopes. Pillowed snow has also been observed near ridge tops on northerly aspects.
This problem should be confined to near and above treeline terrain. Wind slabs are most reactive during formation, and the first day or two after.
Upper elevation coverage on December 5, 2019. Photo taken by Derik Spice.
Second gulley above the clouds....good coverage on December 5, 2019. Photo taken by B. J. Boyle.
As of December 2nd, uphill travel at the Arizona Snowbowl is closed.
Normally, eight inches of new snow would seem significant, but in the aftermath of last week's "White Friday Storm" and our season's opening storm the week before, precipitation on December 4 and 5, hardly raises an eyebrow. Still, it is important to avoid complacency. The ASBTP station anemometer has not been reporting for some time. As a consequence, we have only observations of wind velocities, but little empirical data. Also of note, visibility has been restricted due to low cloud cover and fog. Rain and mist were reported at 11,500’ in the early stages of the storm. Winds were moderate out of the northwest as snow fell. Precipitation was mainly rain below 9,000’ with some locations reporting up to an inch.
On December 6 and 7, the sky will clear somewhat and temperatures will warm to seasonal normals as a broad high pressure ridge moves through our region. At treeline high temperatures are expected to rise slightly above freezing and lows in the 20s. Another A Pacific low is expected Saturday evening through Monday, but at the moment, precipitation amounts seem modest with Two to seven inches of snowfall forecasted.
Arizona Snowbowl Ski patrol reports a 52" base at 10,800 ft. Snowslide SNOTEL reports a 36” snow depth, down from a November 30th high of 52".
Since November 29, SNOTEL temperatures have ranged between 6°F on November 30th, and 44°F on December 2nd. ASBTP station (11,555') reported a low of 0°F on November 30th and a high of 41°F on December 2nd.
The avalanche problem/character describes part of the current avalanche danger. However because we only realease a summary once a week, the current avalanche problem will likely change.
Understanding avalanche problems is essential, because it allows you to determine your approach and strategies to risk treatment. Below are brief descriptions of avalanche problems/characters, and links to detailed information on the problem, formation, patterns, recognition, and avoidance strategies.
Avalanche Problems Explained Also see the North American Danger Scale.
Release of dry unconsolidated snow. These avalanches typically occur within layers of soft snow near the surface of the snowpack. Loose-dry avalanches start at a point and entrain snow as they move downhill, forming a fan-shaped avalanche. Other names for loose-dry avalanches include point-release avalanches or sluffs. Loose-dry avalanches can trigger slab avalanches that break into deeper snow layers.
Loose Dry avalanches are usually relatively harmless to people. They can be hazardous if you are caught and carried into or over a terrain trap (e.g. gully, rocks, dense timber, cliff, crevasse) or down a long slope. Avoid traveling in or above terrain traps when Loose Dry avalanches are likely.
Release of a soft cohesive layer (a slab) of new snow that breaks within the storm snow or on the old snow surface. Storm-slab problems typically last between a few hours and few days. Storm-slabs that form over a persistent weak layer (surface hoar, depth hoar, or near-surface facets) may be termed Persistent Slabs or may develop into Persistent Slabs.
You can reduce your risk from Storm Slabs by waiting a day or two after a storm before venturing into steep terrain. Storm slabs are most dangerous on slopes with terrain traps, such as timber, gullies, over cliffs, or terrain features that make it difficult for a rider to escape off the side.
Release of a cohesive layer of snow (a slab) formed by the wind.
Wind typically transports snow from the upwind sides of terrain features and deposits snow on the downwind side.
Wind slabs are often smooth and rounded and sometimes sound hollow, and can range from soft to hard.
Wind slabs that form over a persistent weak layer (surface hoar, depth hoar, or near-surface facets) may be termed Persistent Slabs or may develop into Persistent Slabs.
Wind Slabs form in specific areas, and are confined to lee and cross-loaded terrain features.
They can be avoided by sticking to sheltered or wind-scoured areas.
Release of a cohesive layer of soft to hard snow (a slab) in the middle to upper snowpack, when the bond to an underlying persistent weak layer breaks. Persistent layers include: surface hoar, depth hoar, near-surface facets, or faceted snow.
Persistent weak layers can continue to produce avalanches for days, weeks or even months, making them especially dangerous and tricky. As additional snow and wind events build a thicker slab on top of the persistent weak layer, this avalanche problem may develop into a Deep Persistent Slab.
The best ways to manage the risk from Persistent Slabs is to make conservative terrain choices.
They can be triggered by light loads and weeks after the last storm.
The slabs often propagate in surprising and unpredictable ways.
This makes this problem difficult to predict and manage and requires a wide safety buffer to handle the uncertainty.
Deep Persistent Slab
Release of a thick cohesive layer of hard snow (a slab), when the bond breaks between the slab and an underlying persistent weak layer, deep in the snowpack or near the ground.
The most common persistent weak layers involved in deep, persistent slabs are depth hoar or facets surrounding a deeply buried crust. Deep Persistent Slabs are typically hard to trigger, are very destructive and dangerous due to the large mass of snow involved, and can persist for months once developed. They are often triggered from areas where the snow is shallow and weak, and are particularly difficult to forecast for and manage.
They commonly develop when Persistent Slabs become more deeply buried over time.
Deep Persistent Slabs are destructive and deadly events that can take months to stabilize.
You can trigger them from well down in the avalanche path, and after dozens of tracks have crossed the slope.
Release of wet unconsolidated snow or slush. These avalanches typically occur within layers of wet snow near the surface of the snowpack, but they may quickly gouge into lower snowpack layers.
Like Loose Dry Avalanches, they start at a point and entrain snow as they move downhill, forming a fan-shaped avalanche. They generally move slowly, but can contain enough mass to cause significant damage to trees, cars or buildings. Other names for loose-wet avalanches include point-release avalanches or sluffs. Loose Wet avalanches can trigger slab avalanches that break into deeper snow layers.
Travel when the snow surface is colder and stronger. Plan your trips to avoid crossing on or under very steep slopes in the afternoon. Move to colder, shadier slopes once the snow surface turns slushly. Avoid steep, sunlit slopes above terrain traps, cliffs areas and long sustained steep pitches.
Release of a cohesive layer of snow (a slab) that is generally moist or wet when the flow of liquid water weakens the bond between the slab and the surface below (snow or ground). They often occur during prolonged warming events and/or rain-on-snow events. Wet Slabs can be very destructive.
Avoid terrain where and when you suspect Wet Slab avalanche activity. Give yourself a wide safety buffer to handle the uncertainty.
Cornice Fall is the release of an overhanging mass of snow that forms as the wind moves snow over a sharp terrain feature, such as a ridge, and deposits snow on the downwind (leeward) side.
Cornices range in size from small wind lips of soft snow to large overhangs of hard snow that are 30 feet (10 meters) or taller. They can break off the terrain suddenly and pull back onto the ridge top and catch people by surprise even on the flat ground above the slope. Even small cornices can have enough mass to be destructive and deadly. Cornice Fall can entrain loose surface snow or trigger slab avalanches.
Cornices can never be trusted and avoiding them is necessary for safe backcountry travel. Stay well back from ridge line areas with cornices. They often overhang the ridge edge can be triggered remotely. Avoid areas underneath cornices. Even small Cornice Fall can trigger a larger avalanche and large Cornice Fall can easily crush a human. Periods of significant temperature warm-up are times to be particularly aware.
Release of the entire snow cover as a result of gliding over the ground. Glide avalanches can be composed of wet, moist, or almost entirely dry snow. They typically occur in very specific paths, where the slope is steep enough and the ground surface is relatively smooth. The are often proceeded by full depth cracks (glide cracks), though the time between the appearance of a crack and an avalanche can vary between seconds and months. Glide avalanches are unlikely to be triggered by a person, are nearly impossible to forecast, and thus pose a hazard that is extremely difficult to manage.
Predicting the release of Glide Avalanches is very challenging. Because Glide Avalanches only occur on very specific slopes, safe travel relies on identifying and avoiding those slopes. Glide cracks are a significant indicator, as are recent Glide Avalanches.
Snowpack Summary Disclaimer
The summaries on this site were written by Kachina Peaks Avalanche Center Board Members. They are based on a broad spectrum of data collected from weather stations, National Weather Service point forecasts and field observation by qualified individuals.
The summaries are not intended to substitute for good knowledge and decision making skills in avalanche terrain. If you have any doubt of stable conditions, please stay away from avalanche terrain. You can usually find good places to go that are not prone to avalanches, such as on low angle slopes away from avalanche run-out zones. If you have any questions about where to find such places, you should consider further avalanche educational opportunities, such as those listed on our education page.
Snowpack Summary – Format and Limitations Statement
Starting in 2012 Kachina Peaks Avalanche Center (KPAC) has publish a weekly Snowpack Summary on our website.
These summaries are currently issued on Friday afternoons. On occasion, we will give storm updates or warnings of rapidly increasing avalanche hazard at more frequent intervals.
Our objective is to reach weekend recreationist, informing this user group of prevailing conditions, but particularly warning of avalanche hazards whenever they are present.
Many people have asked us why we use the format we do, but do not include a danger rating or a hazard/stability rose as many other avalanche centers do around the west.
The National Avalanche Center (NAC) advises small operations like KPAC, who do not issue daily bulletins to not use danger ratings in our snowpack summaries due to the regular but intermittent nature of their field observations and the length of time between issuance of snowpack summaries.
A primary concern is for how conditions can change in the time between publications, potentially giving the public misleading information. At this point, we simply do not have resources to monitor the snowpack at the level necessary to accurately produce more frequent bulletins.
While we understand the benefits of a danger rating using the North American Danger Scale, we also feel that our format encourages people to dig in a little deeper, and spend some time reading what our forecasters are saying. Although the area that we forecast is relatively small, the variability has proven quite large.
Inner Basin conditions are often surprisingly different from those on the more wind-affected western side on the Peaks.
We hope the information that we provide in summaries helps give you a good overview of what is going on out there, and what avalanche problems you should be attentive to, but if there is any uncertainty, then we encourage you to ask questions via Facebook or firstname.lastname@example.org.